University of Newcastle coursework

Warman Design & Build

Designed, built, and demonstrated a scale prototype of an autonomous system for handling fuel and oxidiser vessels and depositing each in its matching silo, constrained to a 400 × 400 × 400 mm volume and a mass of 6 kg.

2023 · Fusion · Mechanical design lead · 4th at International Final

What I did

  • Took ownership of mechanical design and fabrication, converting the team’s initial concept into a fully functional crane.
  • Modelled each mechanical component and assembly in Fusion, resolving interfaces and fits.
  • 3D-printed non-standard PETG parts, machined the rails, and assembled the crane.
  • Tested the mechanical subsystem and assisted with electrical and final integration testing.
Warman competition track showing drop zones and silos
Warman competition track

Decisions that mattered

A 1.33 mm window

One toolhead had to lift balls of two sizes: 67 mm tennis balls and 40 mm squash balls. The combs rode up over a ball and dropped closed behind it.

That only worked inside a 1.33 mm band of comb-tip length. Longer, and it stopped the tennis ball going in; shorter, and the squash ball dropped straight back out. The first toolhead was laser-cut and iterated by eye, and worked poorly.

When I took over design and fabrication:

  • Calculated the correct comb length and achieved a working geometry in one 3D-printed iteration.
  • Changed to a rubber-band-loaded comb because the previous passive combs jammed.
  • Redesigned the toolhead in PETG with hollow infill, halving its initial mass.
Toolhead testing

Accuracy against mass

Gantry v1 ran on rubberised wheels, and the rails deflected under the expected load, which affected accuracy. Swapping to bearings fixed it but added mass to all rails.

I took the trade-off and recovered the added mass by tightening the bearing-to-rail tolerance, redesigning the gantry carriages, and machining slots in the rails.

Full extension and retraction test

Smooth operator

The central column of v1 and v2 combined a steel tube, a high-mounted servo for an off-centre vertical pivot, and a horizontal pivot platform with its mass distributed across three bearings. All printed parts were in PLA.

When I took over:

  • Replaced all PLA-printed parts with PETG.
  • Reduced overall mass by replacing the steel tube with a single centrally mounted servo.
  • Fully redesigned the horizontal pivot platform with a five-bearing base, the bearings placed where the torque peaked during operation.
Warman crane version 2 (left) compared with version 3 (right)
Warman crane v2 (left) versus v3 (right)

Model

The final Warman design stowed against the start line of the competition track: the black-painted plywood base and box, the star turntable and servo pivot, the five-rail cascading arm tilted down from the pivot to the rubber-band comb toolhead, which rests on the base plate facing the tennis and squash balls in their marked drop zones, and the tall fuel silo and short oxidiser silo at either end, white tubes held by green clamps to blue posts

What I’d change

Subsystem masses were first estimated from the components expected to survive prototyping, but fixes during testing added mass that was not accounted for. A mass budget updated at every design change would have caught those problems earlier.

Communication between team members would have been better with a project manager tracking accountability, capacity, and timelines.

Competition highlight

Team project with Alec S., Callen N., and James W.